آخر تحديث


General update: 27-05-2017 21:34

مراسيم وتشريعات

الافتتاحية

Editorial

بلا قيود

أعلام سوريون

left ads2

كتاب الأسبوع

باب مرصود

 

ThawraOnLine - By Editor in Chief: Ali Kassem
The reactions of the Zionist circles on what happened concerning the Israeli programmed aggression to help the terrorists and to reverse equation that Israel supposed over the past years, do not hide the confusion which shadows the real understanding of the emerging rules of engagement with the substantive amendments, with which Israel would be forced to make radical modification at all of the related approaches that will -necessarily- go along with the system of aggression in which all who stand behind it get equal, or even those who push the scene to go ahead, even if this was partly to test or check .. !!

The dilemma is not in a clearer perception of the nature of the aggression practiced by Israel, nor in the case of understanding and harmony that have appeared publicly with terrorists and their organizations in different nomenclatures, but in the context of those forced necessity that prompted Israel wrongly to aid the tools of the system of aggression by various terrorists forms and clones, which came strongly to the scene of the attraction based in the region, where what is happening is no longer just out of the current rules of engagement, whether agreed or not, but in the inauguration of the new rules of engagement that do not resemble what preceded, and cannot continue in the comparison based on its past determinants or its dull reactions to the developments.

The presumption, in that, is not limited to the Israeli reactions and having to admit orgy, but in the context of its both directions messages whether in timing or content, where duel in reading and analysis of what is happening is no longer persuasive or able to draw the crossing or matching lines, or to determine the actual differences between the disharmony and conflict in the regional equations, and that the conflict with Israel is not a deferred case as far as it is a constant situation, and in the last aggression, it did not make mistake in timing only, but also in content, because what was happened ends definitively a lot of what has been promoted and build upon of illusions or fantasies taking large part of the debate to the first square.

Syria, who has repeatedly warned of the consequences of the Israeli orgy, and sent warning messages to the international community through the International Organization and effective and influential capitals, Syria was certain that the orgy will not stop at any limit, and that Israeli direct response to the requirements of the terrorists is not out of real understanding of the relation with them, as evidenced by repeated scenes that it built on false and fabricated pretexts in the context of justification for its various attacks and blatant interference to protect terrorists. Syria has dealt with the scene in its various aspects with a lot of patience and self control, and sometimes, by indirect responding which haven't deterred Israel, while it understood it as it is reflecting a different scene in which Israel had exaggerated in reading it in false and wrong way.

Based on this, there is nothing in the Syrian response and confronting aggression that push to firmly believe that there is a change in the rules of the current engagement, as much a confirmation of what is confirmed about the necessity of confrontation of the Israeli attack, and that the Israeli overt and direct join to the side of terrorists is not a result of an Israeli purely decision as much as it reflects an agreed and integrated vision with the system of aggression from the beginning to the end, of course, along with the terrorist organizations and its various arms, and it is a must also to confront it to put an end to it or to prevent it going so far again.

On the same pattern, this applies to different types of aggression practiced by the countries in the neighborhood, including Turkey and others, that the red lines, until the moment, are drawn by the standards of the real understanding of how it should be and that the response to any attack from any side wouldn't be delayed, and as happened with the Israeli, will happen with the others, and that the stage of deliberation and political engagement is probably nearing an end, and that the aggression should be faced by what goes with its nature, which has to be seriously taken in all assessments and readings and even abuses under the pretext of combating terrorism.

The clearest is that the Israeli attack was not devoid of its political objectives, though the system of aggression tried to show it in different way, as evidenced by shocking reading to many of whom within that system, which considers the Israeli orgy as a prelude opening the gates of hell for the region and the world, furthermore, there are those who want to add to it to be compatible with the wishes, which the Israeli assault seemed to express them behaviorally, so that it is a preface to testing the next fronts of aggression and the alternatives, and perhaps windows of joint work between Israel and alliance of moderation with the leading participation of Turkey and political sponsorship and protection of America.

The change of the rules of engagement is not an experimentally act that is feasible to touch in an open fronts to the unknown with which orgy doesn't fit on the edge of the abyss. Anyway, it doesn't be determined by the case of assault or system of aggression, as far as it is represented across a confrontation that opens its files and papers, with the points of strength and weakness, to the difficult tests, to produce the new rules of engagement, though in some fractions, they may be reproduced from the outcome of erroneous conclusions, which do not want to recognize that the terrorist project and tools and tentacles are facing failure expressed by Israeli orgy, and may be reflected later in scenarios of aggression and difficult options in which the system of aggression ruminates.

Translated by Amal Suleiman Ma'rouf

 

Share

ورد الان

 

مصدر عسكري: وحدات من الجيش والقوات المسلحة بالتعاون مع القوات الرديفة تعيد الأمن والاستقرار الى قرى موالح جنوبية والسكرية والمكننة الزراعية وغرب مسكنة ب 3 كم و الكرمة وموالح شمالية وجب النينة وأبو سوسة وطاعوس وتل العبد والعيس الشرقي والعيس الغربي وأم ثورة في ريف حلب الشرقي

اشتباكات عنيفة واصابات كثيرة في صفوف مسلحي تنظيم داعش وجبهة النصرة الارهابيين، بعد هجوم من قبل تنظيم داعش الارهابي فجر اليوم على مواقع  تنظيم النصرة الارهابي من ثلاثة محاور وهي شميس العجرم، خربة داوود، والشاحوط سرج النموره، باتجاه وادي حميد، الملاهي، العجرم، خربة يونين في جرود عرسال

الجيش السوري يتصدى لهجوم لما يسمى جيش "الثوار" الممول من الولايات المتحدة وبريطانيا على احد المواقع قرب سد الزلف

 مصدر عسكري: وحدات من الجيش العربي السوري بالتعاون مع القوات الرديفة تستعيد السيطرة على منطقة وقرية العليانية جنوب خنيفيس بريف حمص وتقضي على أعداد من إرهابيي “داعش” وتدمر أسلحتهم وعتادهم

 




 

هذا علمي

خطاب القسم

كلمة الثورة أون لاين

ورد الآن

فوق الطاولة

السابق التالي

مواقع صديقة

 

facebook-twitter

 

 

صحتك بالدنيا